Document 19, p 18
| Mr Smeaton again – | ||||
| With the Materials of the Bridge | ||||
| so beat down what would be the Expence | ||||
| of rebuilding it? | ||||
| I cannot pretend to ascertain | ||||
| the Expence of rebuilding it, but as | ||||
| an Answer to the Scope of the | ||||
| Question I can say from the Accounts | ||||
| I have had of the Situation of the | ||||
| Bridge & the Materials belonging to | ||||
| it, that if the County or any other | ||||
| Person were Desirous of trying another | ||||
| Experiment there is a more valuable | ||||
| preparation of Materials than Mr | ||||
| Errington received from the County | ||||
| Amongst the Piers which were | ||||
| injured that Pier appeared to | ||||
| have the least injury that had | ||||
| most | ||||
| been ⁁ hurt by the Accident during | ||||
| the | ||||
| 18 | ||||
Note: Minutes of Committee to consider Mr Errington's Petition, p 18
Abbreviations are underlined like this Wm. and the expansion may be seen by moving the cursor over it.
| An entry outlined like this has a note which may be seen by hovering over it. |
Transcribed by CTW and TB