Document 112, letter from Mr Letteney to Mr Heron, 18 April 1789
| R.A. Heron Esq | 219 | |||
| Newcastle upon | Dr Sr | |||
| Tyne | Scott & Allgood. I've just now $rec'd$ the inclosed in | |||
| time to save the post | ||||
| Errington v Aynsley & ors. In consequence of Mr $Sol'r$ | ||||
| General & Mr King's opinion, at a Consultation the Court | ||||
| is to be moved, on Tuesday next that the Plt may | ||||
| have to the last day of E. Term to pay the 4000L | ||||
| and that he may be at liberty to pay it into the | ||||
| Bank in the name of the Accot Genl to the Credit of | ||||
| the Cause but without prejudice to his right of $appl'g$ | ||||
| to the Court in the mean time, for a rehearing in | ||||
| case he should be so advised by his Councell. You must | ||||
| know that when this cause was heard the Chr | ||||
| dropt a few words intimating that the "Issue shoud | ||||
| have been wher Mr E had not engaged to do an | ||||
| impossible thing"- The Sol'r Gen'l was absent, at | ||||
| the hearing and the chief object of the intended | ||||
| motion is to trye whether the Chanr will $recom'd$ | ||||
| an Appl for a Rehearing I am | ||||
| Dr Sr | ||||
| Yrs J. Letteny | ||||
| 18th April 1789 | ||||
Abbreviations are underlined like this Wm. and the expansion may be seen by moving the cursor over it.
| An entry outlined like this has a note which may be seen by hovering over it. |
Transcribed by TB and CTW