Document 76, p 2; John Tweddell and Bacon Wastell, Gawen Aynsley
| to be built upon a more extensive and consequently a more expensive plan | ||||
| than the plan accdg to wch the former Bridge in the sd Bill mentd | ||||
| was built by ye sd Complt as therein set forth And wher such former | ||||
| Plan is sufficient and effectual for answering the purpose of making | ||||
| a safe & lasting Bridge. | ||||
| [5]th Excon | For that the sd Defts Jno Tweddell and B. W. Wastell have not in | |||
| manner afsd ansd & set forth Wher it is for the reason and under the | ||||
| Circs in the sd Bill mentd & set forth reasble & just that the sd Complt | ||||
| shod be bound so strictly by ye Artles of Agreement in the sd Bill set | ||||
| forth as to be compelled to build anor Bridge on the same plan as | ||||
| in the sd Bill in that Behalf mentd and to uphold the same for | ||||
| the Term of 7 Years therein mentd And if so why & for what reasons | ||||
| And wher yr [Petner?] is not ready & willing to make ye sd Defts a | ||||
| reasble Satisfaction in the Premes. | ||||
| In all wch Particulars the Ansr of ye sd Defts | ||||
| Jno Tweddell & B. W. Wastell to the sd Bill of | ||||
| Complt is as yr sd Complt is advised & hbly insists | ||||
| is evasive & insufficient And therefore the sd Complt | ||||
| excepts thereto & prays that the sd Defts may be | ||||
| compelled to put in a better & more suffct Ansr | ||||
| thereto. | ||||
| E. King | ||||
| In Chancery | ||||
| Between Henry Errington Esquire Complainant | ||||
| & | ||||
| Gawen Aynsley Esqr John Tweddell & B. | ||||
| William Wastell Esqr Defts | ||||
| Exceptions taken by ye sd Complt to the Ansr of the sd Dft | ||||
| Gawen Aynsley to the sd Complts Bill of Complaint | ||||
| [1]st Excon | For that the sd Deft Gawen Aynsley hath not in & by his sd Ansr | |||
| accdg to the best & utmost of his Knowl Remembrance Information & | ||||
| Belief ansd and set forth Wher the sd Bridge in that Behalf mentd and | ||||
| which was built by the sd Complt as therein set forth was not so | ||||
| thrown down and destroyed as in the sd Bill mentd without any | ||||
| previous appearance of any defect in the constructing or building | ||||
| thereof or how and in what respect otherwise | ||||
| 2 | ||||
Note: Henry Errington's Exceptions p 2; edge of page missing
Abbreviations are underlined like this Wm. and the expansion may be seen by moving the cursor over it.
| An entry outlined like this has a note which may be seen by hovering over it. |
Transcribed by CTW and KS