| 167 | ||||
| To prove that Witness at the Time the Bridge was built was | ||||
| County Surveyor of Bridges – |
||||
| applied to Mr. Tweddell & Mr Wastell two of the plaintiffs | ||||
| to recommend him to be employed on the Building of Hexham | ||||
| Bridge as Superintendant under Mr Smeaton – that they did | ||||
| recommend him – that in pursuance of such Recommendation | ||||
| he was so employed during the whole of the Time – that the | ||||
| Bridge was built according to Mr Smeatons Directions to all | ||||
| Intents & purposes – that the work was executed as well as | ||||
| possible – | ||||
| That he was employed in making |
||||
| Materials between the County and Laybourne & Maddison | ||||
| judge of the Value of the Materials received by Mr Errington | ||||
| because some of them were used in building a Bank near the | ||||
| Scite of Sir Walter Blacketts Bridge – other[s?] of them were sold | ||||
| and those Remaining were of considerable less Value to Mr | ||||
| Errington than they were estimated at – because the Estimate was | ||||
| made between the County and their workmen of the Value of | ||||
| the Materials where they lay |
||||
| carried to another place – were to be applied to a Building | ||||
| of different Dimensions and were therefore of not one third | ||||
| of the Value to Mr. Errington – all Jonathan Pickernell | ||||
Note: Draft proof of evidence, Mr Pickernell
Abbreviations are underlined like this Wm. and the expansion may be seen by moving the cursor over it.
| An entry outlined like this has a note which may be seen by hovering over it. |
Transcribed by RMS and CTW