Mr Heron Esqr* | 159 | |||
Newcastle upon | ||||
Tyne | Dr Sir | |||
Errington v Aynsley & ors – I deferrd answering your | ||||
favor ’till I had seen Mr Scott. He conceives the point in the | ||||
1 Janry 1787 | Cause to be, the impracticability of building a Bridge on | |||
Mr Lettenys Lre as to | the same Plan & situation, that woud have a Chance | |||
the Interrs | of remaining there for any length of Time. Donkin must | |||
therefore be interrogated under the 4. & 5th Interrs and as | ||||
it may be proper to prove the Justice’s directing an | ||||
Estimate to be made by Mr Smeaton in order to ascertn | ||||
the Sum to be pd by Mr Errington to the County, that may | ||||
be done under the last Interry. The Chancellor havg | ||||
signifyed to the Defendts Counsell that they could | ||||
expect nothing more at the hearing than [on?] Jugmt | ||||
of Quant Damt, I should think the Co woud now be | ||||
dispos’d to accept of a Sum to be asertained or as | ||||
ascertained by Smeaton & discharge Mr E. from his Oblign | ||||
Shaftoe. I will write to him to morrow and tho’ I cannot | ||||
find out by Entry, Letter or paper any thing about this | ||||
here, yet he has in his Custody, Documents which | ||||
will convince me, that his Agent pd [??] those 2 [??] | ||||
This is what he has written to me & I shall [??] | ||||
him; & send him my Notes for the Money, [agreed?] | ||||
his [decision?] | ||||
Blackett. I must make this matter the subject of ano[ther] | ||||
Letter. Mrs L & Isabella join me in wishing y[ou] | ||||
all, many happy returns of this Day I am | ||||
Dr Sir | ||||
Yr sincly | ||||
J Letteney | ||||
1 Janry 1787 | ||||
Abbreviations are underlined like this Wm. and the expansion may be seen by moving the cursor over it.
An entry outlined like this has a note which may be seen by hovering over it. |
Transcribed by KS and CTW