«Previous page (066)

Next page (068)»

Document 23, p 4

42
Before the Bridge was built certified That on the 11th day of March 1783
for and even before the Arches were the sd new Bridge was by w[?]
turned 2 or 3 of the piers recd so violence etc
much Damage by a Flood that there
was a total stop put to the work
and Mr Smeaton was sent for from a
great Distance to direct on Mr Erringtons
part and those damaged piers were
repaired in a most extraordinary manner
by raising one of them and underputting
it with wedges and filling up the
Vacuum with loose stones – this Mr
Smeaton or the pson who is produced
on Mr Erringtons behalf to prove the
completion of the Bridge must declare
on being asked and which Defect it
may fairly be presumed was the Cause of
the Bridge being destroyed
Mr Smeaton & Mr Errington well knew from the weakness of the Stratum
& proved
the Stratum before any proposals were Bed of the River discovered by this
given in therefore the Insinuation is fatal Accident any Bridge built
not founded in Truth thereon wld be liable to be thrown
The Accident wch happened to the piers down by etc
above stated when building proves
there was a former Flood But to
put this out of Doubt there was
anor Bridge a few yards higher up
wch was compleated and in the great
flood in Novr 1771 wch was sev Feet
higher than that wch took away the
Bridge in Question and wch [???] former
Flood in 1771 took away Ncastle Bridge
Haydon Bridge Ridley Hall Bridge
& Fetherston Bridge all on the same
former
River also took away Hexham Bridge
The Foundation of wch it is supposed
still remains, wch is a proof that tho’
built on the same Stratum with
that of the new Bridge the Foundation
of the petitioners Bridge was not good
and the rather as the manner of securing
it (tho’ advised by Mr Smeaton) is
contrary to the old and apparently by
Proof better Method of building Bridges
on the same River
Again – the Bridge over the same
River at Corbridge near Hexham Bridge

Note: Remarks and objections to Mr Errington's petition p 4

Abbreviations are underlined like this Wm. and the expansion may be seen by moving the cursor over it.

An entry outlined like this has a note which may be seen by hovering over it.

Transcribed by CTW and TB