Document 19, p 20
| To Parliament for his Relief and also | ||||
| to exonerate the County from the | ||||
| eventual Chance of having the Bridge | ||||
| to rebuild or repair. They then directed | ||||
| that the Bill when drawn should be | ||||
| examined by two Counsel one on their | ||||
| Behalf and the other on Behalf of | ||||
| Mr Errington – There were 12 Justices | ||||
| attended that Sessions, and most of them | ||||
| present – there was not the least | ||||
| Objection made |
||||
| In Consequence of these proceedgs | ||||
| The Justices seemed |
||||
| satified of the Impracticability |
||||
| building another Bridge there- | ||||
| The Justices suggested that | ||||
| 20 mode | ||||
Note: Minutes of Committee to consider Mr Errington's Petition, p 20
Abbreviations are underlined like this Wm. and the expansion may be seen by moving the cursor over it.
| An entry outlined like this has a note which may be seen by hovering over it. |
Transcribed by CTW and TB